Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Speaking of Conspiracies . . .

In my last post, I addressed the topic of "conspiracy theories," and how the PTB have instilled in most people a knee-jerk reaction against the idea. Yet, conspiracies operate all the time. The conspirators are the ones who want you to take everything at face value, as in "move on along; nothing to see here."

The greatest conspiracy prior to the multi-trillion dollar bailout thefts involved the 9/11 attacks. They provided the rationale for our stupid, immoral, bankrupting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the concurrent construction of the surveillance state. If it is true, as George Bush said, that the "terrorists attacked us because of our freedom," then they've won. We are much less free than we were eight years ago! Four years of Obama promise to make Bush look like an amateur. But I digress.

A few weeks ago a ground-breaking scientific paper appeared in a peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.” "The paper ends with this sentence: 'Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.'

In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence” exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings. What is high-tech explosive/pyrotechnic material in large quantities doing in the WTC dust? Who made tons of this stuff and why? Why have government investigators refused to look for explosive residues in the WTC aftermath?"

Here is a mainstream television interview with one of the scientists on Dutch TV. Note the discussion of "conspiracy theories" at the end. Most people who dismiss conspiracy theories forget that the outlandish tale of 19 hijackers defeating airport security in three airports, as well as the US air defense system, is itself a "conspiracy theory."

To date, this article has been ignored by the Mainstream Media. But not Raw Story. Surprise, surprise. Nary a peep from the Obama Dept. of Justice, either. "Move on along . . ."

Then today I found this on the excellent George Washington's Blog:
Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission: "At Some Level of the Government, at Some Point in Time . . . There Was an Agreement Not to Tell the Truth"

"On April 14th, the senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission - John Farmer - will publish a book called The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America's Defense on 9/11.

The book has not yet been released, and I'm not sure what Farmer will say. But here is a quote available on Amazon:

At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened.

Farmer's publisher, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt [mainstream publisher], says of the book:

Farmer builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version not only is almost entirely untrue but serves to create a false impression of order and security.

Farmer has previously said:

I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."
Here's a related story with more background going back to earlier concerns of other commission members about lying and cover-ups.

More people are catching on to the truth daily. The Smoking Mirrors blog analyzes many of the implications of the dawning truth about 9/11. While I applaud the people starting to overcome their cognitive dissonance and wake up to the truth, I also know it means we are much closer to Obama's version of 9/11.

Remember that Joe Biden and others warned that early in Obama's reign we would face a great crisis? Even Obama has warned us that he expects new al-CIAda attacks on US soil. Nothing like a new "shock and awe" event to snuff out the rising taxpayer rebellion and state sovereignty movement, deflect attention to a new war, and impose martial law. If/when this happens folks, try not to lose your head like we all did the first time eight years ago.

While most knee-jerk liberals are joining in a mesmerized trance behind the Pied Piper Obama, an increasing number of conservatives are awakening from their Bush-induced stupor. They're beginning to realize that Cheney-Bush made major strides in constructing a police state that Obama will now use to target those same conservative, constitutionalists as potential domestic terrorist threats to our security!

Just a few weeks ago just-released memos from the Justice Department revealed that elements withing the Bush administration were developing plans for a complete military takeover of the US. This was shortly after the leaked MIAC report identified constitutionalists, Ron Paul supporters and others as possible domestic terrorists as a warning to law enforcement. Since the MIAC reported was leaked from one of fifty national "fusion centers," it was likely that this was part of a larger, nationally coordinated effort.

Subsequently, the Virginia Terrorism Assessment said much the same thing, followed by a leaked report directly from DHS predicting "terrorism" in response to new gun restrictions coming from Obama. The media tried to blame the recent murder-suicide rampage at the New York cultural center on a man who was supposedly distraught over this! The report even equates abortion opponents with white supremacists!

It seems DHS and their ilk sense that regular working people, taxpayers who just want to live their lives and raise their children, are getting "mad as hell and aren't going to take it any more," to quote Howard Beal in Network. Tomorrow is the most dreaded day of the year, April 15. That's the day that we line up to pay tribute to the government according to the 15th Amendment that many maintain wasn't even legally passed.

Tea Parties are happening all over the country as people are looking for an outlet to release their anger. They may lead to larger riots and civil unrest just like we're seeing all over Europe, China and elsewhere. May we hope that all the protests remain peaceful, that this becomes a "velvet revolution." Gerald Celente, the noted trends forecaster, has predicted, and is calling for, peaceful, focused revolution as the only way to save America.

The Global Elite are obviously worried. We're seeing an effort by the political establishment to funnel the protests into Republican, rather than non-partisan endeavors. We're also seeing commentators like Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter positioning themselves as leaders. These are the same people that ridiculed Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and their Constitutional arguments during the Presidential campaign. It's an old tactic to try to co opt and control the opposition. Let's not let it happen this time.

And even then, what do we do after the Tea Parties? Do we dig in and work for substantial change? Or do we go back about our business while the last flames of liberty are snuffed out?

The choice, dear readers, is up to you and you and me. If we will each do our part to awaken one more person, or to resist the machinery or throw sand in the gears of tyranny wherever we see them, then we can prevail. May God help us!

See you at the Tea Party -- I hope!

Grace and Peach and Courage to you!

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have organized a Tea Party in our county and have had many folks interested.
Meanwhile the Homeland Security Department is warning that our soldiers returning home may be joining up with the "right wing" radical terrorists!
You would think extreme rhetoric likening our returning soldiers to radicals would wake some people up!
I am against the war, but I can't imagine disrespecting the soldiers like this!

Anonymous said...

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch2.html

Why would soldiers think they had been lied to?

D. Frank Robinson

Kilrasdidid said...

Porter, the problem with the Thermite study is that they relied on citizens to provide the dust samples. That is *terrible* scientific rigor, on any level of standard, much less one for a scientifically peer-reviewed paper. I do not dismiss the study as a conspiracy theory. I dismiss it as bad science.

Porter Davis said...

If the sample is good, the science is good. The Bush administration did no forensic analysis, having already determined who did it. All the evidence was carted off under strict guard, and the steel was sold to China. Never was investigated as a crime scene. This is just another nail in the coffin of the official conspiracy theory.

Kilrasdidid said...

But, Porter, that is just the point. Since the samples were not collected from ground zero, and they were not collected by the scientists themselves, there is absolutely no way to verify if the samples are "good." It is bad science. I completely agree with you that many things being dismissed as "conspiracy theories" should be investigated, but your bringing up this study does nothing to strengthen that stance. I do not say this out of disrespect. Rather, I point it out so that a more legitimate discussion can be had regarding the 9/11 attacks and other dismissed "conspiracies."

Porter Davis said...

Nor do I think this study weakens the case on 9/11 being an inside job. Evidently the editorial staff of the peer-reviewed journal put enough credence in the study to publish it. This study is just a small part of the preponderance of evidence that we've been lied to about 9/11.

As for thermite being used, the molten metal in the basements for many weeks after 9/11, the photo of the diagonal cut on a support beam, the photos of molten metal pouring out of the towers, the pulverization of the concrete, the neat cutting of beams in trailor-length sizes, the multiple explosions in the basements, the free-fall drop of the buildings, etc. all point to controlled demolition. And then there's the 47-story WTC7. The NIST report on that is junk science at its worst.